{"id":1247,"date":"2010-10-25T09:35:51","date_gmt":"2010-10-25T13:35:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/?p=1247"},"modified":"2010-10-25T09:35:51","modified_gmt":"2010-10-25T13:35:51","slug":"lg-blueray-player-nit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/?p=1247","title":{"rendered":"LG BlueRay Player Nit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll just preface this complaint by stating that I love our LG Blue Ray player. It is used constantly to stream stuff from Netflix and to play Pandora music. From a functional standpoint, I really have no substantial complaints.<\/p>\n<p>But from a maintenance perspective, I have a big complaint about the update process.  It violates one of the UI best-practices- excessive verification.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>When I power it on, I get a question:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;New software is available, would you like to check if your player can be updated?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Well, sure.  I&#8217;d hate to not be able play a disc or something.  After a couple seconds of graphical funny business, we get the next query:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;An update is available, would you like to download it?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Seriously?  WTF was the first question about?  Why would you alert me that updates are available, ask me to verify if the update is available, and then ask me if it&#8217;s OK to download it?  Why wouldn&#8217;t I want to download it?  Am I supposed to go and launch a research project into whether this new update is really a good idea?  How exactly would I know that?<\/p>\n<p>But wait, it gets better:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Update has been downloaded successfully.  Would you like to proceed with update?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>No, I&#8217;d like to sit here and answer more stupid questions.  Why not ask if I&#8217;m having a nice day?  Oh right, they probably know the answer at this point&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Next up:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Update completed.  The player will automatically turn off in 5 seconds.  Please press OK.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now I have a question:  Did anybody actually read that prior to signing off on it?  It&#8217;s going to turn off &#8220;automatically&#8221; after I press a button? <\/p>\n<p>Sure enough, it powers down.  Now I have to turn it back on again.  Grrrr.<\/p>\n<p>Now I&#8217;ll be constructive.  For one, I can understand giving a user control over the software version running on the device.  But there should be a global setting where the user can choose to either update automatically, or under user control.<\/p>\n<p>If under user control, the process should be &#8220;An update is available for your player.  Would you like to update?&#8221;  That&#8217;s it.  One verification question. There&#8217;s no good reason to have verification for checking if an update is available, then checking if it&#8217;s OK to download the update and so on.  Lastly, I don&#8217;t see why it has to &#8220;power-down.&#8221;  There&#8217;s a processor running that player and all the program <em>should<\/em> have to do is &#8220;jump to 0.&#8221;  That&#8217;s tech talk for &#8220;reset.&#8221;  It saves the user from having to press the &#8220;ON&#8221; button again.<\/p>\n<p>If the global setting is for automatic updates, then the player should go and perform the update while the unit is &#8220;OFF.&#8221;  How can it do that?  Well, the thing is, it&#8217;s not really &#8220;OFF&#8221; since it needs to be in some minimal operative state to get the remote &#8220;ON&#8221; command.  There&#8217;s no good reason it can&#8217;t go and perform a check once a day, or once a week on it&#8217;s own and take action accordingly behind the scenes if an update is available.  They could even set a notification flag so that the next time the unit is turned &#8220;ON,&#8221; I get a pop-up notification that can be dismissed with one button press.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll just preface this complaint by stating that I love our LG Blue Ray player. It is used constantly to stream stuff from Netflix and to play Pandora music. From a functional standpoint, I really have no substantial complaints. But from a maintenance perspective, I have a big complaint about the update process. It violates [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-misc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1247","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1247"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1247\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sahd.lamafam.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}